|
Comment
Mozart redeems my
mediocrity
We should
cherish those who possess great talent rather than envying them and
begrudging their success
Dylan
Evans
Thursday July 21, 2005
The Guardian
In
ancient Greece, people expected their heroes to be different. The first
readers of the Iliad didn't imagine they could ever be as great as
Achilles. They accepted that he was in a completely different category,
a different order of being. And they didn't envy him his superior
talent - they admired him for it.
Nowadays,
if someone is vastly more talented than us, we don't congratulate them
- we envy them and resent their success. It seems we don't want heroes
we can admire, so much as heroes we can identify with.
We want to
think we
could be like them, and so we make sure to select heroes that are like
us. We worship David Beckham because he's fallible. If Achilles were
around today, the headlines would all be about his heel.
This
is the real reason for the astonishing rise of reality TV. We allow
halfwits to become celebrities precisely because there is no great gap
separating them from us. That consoles us, because it makes us think
that we could be famous if we had a bit more luck, or if we tried a bit
harder. We can't bear the idea that some people might be better than
us, so much better that we could never be like them, no matter how hard
we tried. That upsets our democratic ethos, our belief that all people
are born equal.
But
raw talent is not distributed equally. By definition, most of us are
not exceptional. We are neither particularly stupid, nor especially
intelligent. Only a very few are extremely gifted. But it is to these
exceptionally talented people that the rest of us owe most of the
greatest achievements of humankind. The Mona Lisa, the Goldberg
Variations and King Lear were not the work of ordinary people like you
and me. They were the work of geniuses, people so much more talented
than us that we could never paint or write anything comparable to their
achievements, no matter how hard we tried or how long we lived.
To
some, that thought seems so humiliating and threatening that it must
not even be countenanced. But to me it is liberating and inspiring. It
is precisely the realisation that I will never be the equal of Mozart
or Goethe that allows me to sit back and enjoy what they have
bequeathed to me. It is my recognition of their greatness, my admission
of the immeasurable superiority of their talent, that redeems my
mediocrity. It is good to be human, not because every human can be
great, but because a few people have shown us the heights to which
humanity can occasionally ascend. Without the shining achievements of
these few, the human race would be a waste of space.
Consider
also how unattractive it is when someone begrudges another's talent,
when they cannot praise success without also seeking to undermine it or
feel diminished when a colleague wins praise. It is a sign of a mean
spirit.
Conversely,
the person who shows unreserved admiration thereby becomes admirable.
To applaud someone else's achievements or good fortune, without the
slightest trace of envy or resentment, is a mark of true generosity.
It
is not just individuals who can be judged by such criteria. Societies
too differ in terms of their attitude to success. It is often remarked
that a society should be judged on how it treats its least fortunate
members. But it is equally revealing to observe how a society treats
its most fortunate members. A society that tramples on its poorest and
weakest citizens is clearly less humane than one with social services
and unemployment benefit. But a society that does not reward raw talent
and praise excellence is equally barbaric.
The
just allocation of admiration is a virtue that requires judgment and
integrity: judgment to distinguish genuine talent from mere showiness,
and integrity in refusing to bestow praise on those who do not fully
deserve it. Prizes are only valuable if they are restricted to the very
few. Not winning a prize is not something to be seen as shameful - it
should be the norm, something that happens to the overwhelming majority
of people.
Conversely,
we need social structures that allow for very fine-grained distinctions
to be made at the top of the ability range in any given domain -
whether learning, sport or industry. There is no point in having an
exam system in which more than 5% of the candidates can attain the top
grade, let alone one in which 30% do. Society needs ways of picking out
and rewarding the rare talent that is truly exceptional.
The
rest of us should cherish those who possess such talent, for they are
one of our most valuable resources. They are the scientists who will
come up with the life-saving medicines of the future, the artists who
will inspire us with new works of beauty, the sportsmen and women who
will amaze us with their strength and skill. If we want society to
progress rather than stagnate, we must learn to be more generous, and
rediscover the lost art of pure admiration.
This page was last updated: 27 July 2005.
|